Files @ fc63a1d93803
Branch filter:

Location: kallithea/rhodecode/tests/models/common.py

Marcin Kuzminski
Switched order of actions when doing repo rescan.

doing invalidation after repository scan is not optimal.
In case of big repository we first create an instance then invalidate
cache that we don't actually need. Reversing this order prevents that
from rhodecode.tests import *
from rhodecode.tests.fixture import Fixture

from rhodecode.model.repos_group import ReposGroupModel
from rhodecode.model.repo import RepoModel
from rhodecode.model.db import RepoGroup, Repository, User
from rhodecode.model.user import UserModel

from rhodecode.lib.auth import AuthUser
from rhodecode.model.meta import Session


fixture = Fixture()


def _destroy_project_tree(test_u1_id):
    Session.remove()
    repos_group = RepoGroup.get_by_group_name(group_name='g0')
    for el in reversed(repos_group.recursive_groups_and_repos()):
        if isinstance(el, Repository):
            RepoModel().delete(el)
        elif isinstance(el, RepoGroup):
            ReposGroupModel().delete(el, force_delete=True)

    u = User.get(test_u1_id)
    Session().delete(u)
    Session().commit()


def _create_project_tree():
    """
    Creates a tree of groups and repositories to test permissions

    structure
     [g0] - group `g0` with 3 subgroups
     |
     |__[g0_1] group g0_1 with 2 groups 0 repos
     |  |
     |  |__[g0_1_1] group g0_1_1 with 1 group 2 repos
     |  |   |__<g0/g0_1/g0_1_1/g0_1_1_r1>
     |  |   |__<g0/g0_1/g0_1_1/g0_1_1_r2>
     |  |__<g0/g0_1/g0_1_r1>
     |
     |__[g0_2] 2 repos
     |  |
     |  |__<g0/g0_2/g0_2_r1>
     |  |__<g0/g0_2/g0_2_r2>
     |
     |__[g0_3] 1 repo
        |
        |_<g0/g0_3/g0_3_r1>
        |_<g0/g0_3/g0_3_r2_private>

    """
    test_u1 = UserModel().create_or_update(
        username=u'test_u1', password=u'qweqwe',
        email=u'test_u1@rhodecode.org', firstname=u'test_u1', lastname=u'test_u1'
    )
    g0 = fixture.create_group('g0')
    g0_1 = fixture.create_group('g0_1', group_parent_id=g0)
    g0_1_1 = fixture.create_group('g0_1_1', group_parent_id=g0_1)
    g0_1_1_r1 = fixture.create_repo('g0/g0_1/g0_1_1/g0_1_1_r1', repos_group=g0_1_1)
    g0_1_1_r2 = fixture.create_repo('g0/g0_1/g0_1_1/g0_1_1_r2', repos_group=g0_1_1)
    g0_1_r1 = fixture.create_repo('g0/g0_1/g0_1_r1', repos_group=g0_1)
    g0_2 = fixture.create_group('g0_2', group_parent_id=g0)
    g0_2_r1 = fixture.create_repo('g0/g0_2/g0_2_r1', repos_group=g0_2)
    g0_2_r2 = fixture.create_repo('g0/g0_2/g0_2_r2', repos_group=g0_2)
    g0_3 = fixture.create_group('g0_3', group_parent_id=g0)
    g0_3_r1 = fixture.create_repo('g0/g0_3/g0_3_r1', repos_group=g0_3)
    g0_3_r2_private = fixture.create_repo('g0/g0_3/g0_3_r1_private',
                                          repos_group=g0_3, repo_private=True)
    return test_u1


def expected_count(group_name, objects=False):
    repos_group = RepoGroup.get_by_group_name(group_name=group_name)
    objs = repos_group.recursive_groups_and_repos()
    if objects:
        return objs
    return len(objs)


def _check_expected_count(items, repo_items, expected):
    should_be = len(items + repo_items)
    there_are = len(expected)
    assert  should_be == there_are, ('%s != %s' % ((items + repo_items), expected))


def check_tree_perms(obj_name, repo_perm, prefix, expected_perm):
    assert repo_perm == expected_perm, ('obj:`%s` got perm:`%s` should:`%s`'
                                    % (obj_name, repo_perm, expected_perm))


def _get_perms(filter_='', recursive=True, key=None, test_u1_id=None):
    test_u1 = AuthUser(user_id=test_u1_id)
    for k, v in test_u1.permissions[key].items():
        if recursive and k.startswith(filter_):
            yield k, v
        elif not recursive:
            if k == filter_:
                yield k, v